Guide · Security
An AI agent that acts inside your systems is powerful — and risky if poorly governed. Here are the real risks and the concrete safeguards to deploy with confidence.
The essentials
Least privilege, human validation, logging and safeguards: an AI agent's security is designed in, not added afterward.
Definition
An agent in production touches your data and triggers actions. The question isn't « does it work? » but « what happens when someone tries to trick it, or when it makes a mistake on its own? ». Security answers that question, up front.
Threats
| Risk | What happens | Safeguard |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt injection | Hidden instructions hijack the agent | Separate instructions / data, validate outputs |
| Data leakage | The agent discloses sensitive information | Minimization, compartmentalization, output filters |
| Unchecked action | Unintended sending, payment or deletion | Human validation on high-impact actions |
| Excessive permissions | The agent can do too much | Least privilege, granular permissions |
| No traceability | Impossible to audit a decision | Full logging + alerting |
Method
These principles are at the heart of our custom AI agents and our Claude integrations. The MCP makes access compartmentalization easier when it is properly configured.
Compliance
To go further: our guide AI Act: what companies must do and our sector pages legal and medical.
FAQ
Links verified at publication. Regulatory texts change — always defer to the official source.
A question, a project, an idea? We respond within 24h. Free audit, no commitment.